By Joel Dresang

Imagine her fairy godmother extending Cinderella’s curfew by an hour.

So, instead of the gown reverting to rags and the coach to a gourd when the clock strikes 12, Cinderella gets an extra 60 minutes to enjoy her enchanted evening.

Then consider her folly if she still leaves the ball at midnight.

That’s what’s happening with retirement.

Over decades, our life spans have been stretching. My grandfathers lived to be 53 and 72. My father made it to 88. I, of course, plan to surpass Dad.

Still — since 1935 — the standard retirement age has been stuck at 65. As in our version of Cinderella, despite extra time from the fairy, we’re still geared to waltz off according to the same old script.

“Thirty years were added to average life expectancy in the 20th century, and rather than imagine the scores of ways we could use these years to improve quality of life, we tacked them all on at the end,” Laura Carstensen, founding director of the Stanford (University) Center on Longevity, wrote in The Washington Post. “Only old age got longer.”

Carsten and other longevity experts are advocating for a recasting of when and how we retire. With more life to live after 65, they say, individuals should take more options for how to spend their adult lives.

Other Money Talk articles from Joel Dresang

“Certainly there is a time, either by choice or by circumstance, when someone may choose to retire in the classic sense,” Joseph F. Coughlin, director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology AgeLab, wrote recently in Forbes. “However, as people live longer, and the context of life and work changes, all of us need to prepare for our own evolution not just in older age, but across the life course.”

In August, a couple of celebrities reminded us that tying retirement to an age is growing as old-fashioned as the company pensions bonded workers and their families to employment for life.

At age 40, Serena Williams announced she is quitting tennis to focus more on family and other pursuits. Presumably, she can afford the change. But for most people interested in doing something other than working 40 years and then retiring, financial planning becomes more crucial.

“Financing longevity requires major rethinking,” Carstensen wrote. “Rather than saving ever-larger pots of money for the end of life, we could pool risks in new ways. Generations may share wealth earlier than traditional bequests; we can start savings accounts at birth and allow young adults to work earlier so that compound interest can work in their favor.”

Over 30 years of investment advising, Art Rothschild has worked with individuals pursuing a wide range of courses, including early retirement, post-employment work gigs, travel, transportation, relocations and additional residences.

Art says that knowing his clients and keeping informed of their evolving life plans has helped him advise on investment and spending strategies that suit their individual situations.

“We’re always helping people solve problems,” Art says. “This is not selling a client a product. We’ve been coaching and counseling forever.”

Flexible investment strategies become even more important when age-based retirement regulations don’t keep pace with longer living. For instance:

• The IRS this year revised calculations for required minimum distributions (RMDs) from 401(k) retirement accounts and traditional IRAs. But the revision — based on updated life expectancy estimates — was the first in nearly a decade.
• The age for taking RMDs remains close to the 70½ set by Congress nearly 50 years ago. Lawmakers moved the age up to 72 in 2021. (A proposal to boost it to 75 is under consideration.)
• The eligibility age for Social Security retirement benefits is 62, the same as in the original Social Security Act of 1935. Age eligibility for full retirement benefits, initially set at 65, has increased by only two years in nearly nine decades.
• Medicare still kicks in at 65, the same as it has for the last 57 years.

Carstensen, whose center has initiated a New Map of Life, contends it’s time we make more out of our extended life spans – providing for more retirements later than 65 with longer but more flexible work lives that accommodate breaks along the way for family caregiving, personal activities and career shifts.

“The thirty years added to life expectancy in the 20th century is a gift that allows us more time to live higher-quality lives,” Jialu Liu Streeter, a Stanford economist, wrote. “However, the three added decades also require careful planning to ensure that we reach the full potential of longer lives.”

Coughlin, of the MIT AgeLab, says planning for a longer life means relying on advisors to do more than just get you to 65 with a load of money to last the rest of your life.

“There is no science to 65-years old being retirement age,” Coughlin wrote. “It is simply a 19th century legacy ratified by the sausage-making decision processes of legislatures and corporate boards.”

Another recent celebrity announcement came from Dr. Anthony Fauci, who said he is quitting as head of the infectious diseases agency he joined before Serena Williams was born. Like Williams, Fauci defied the traditional notion of retirement.

“I am not retiring,” said Fauci, who’s 81. “After more than 50 years of government service, I plan to pursue the next phase of my career while I still have so much energy and passion for my field.”

Joel Dresang is vice president-communications at Landaas & Company.

Learn more
Work longer to fatten Social Security, a Money Talk Video with Lisa Lewitzke
Pandemic-inspired retirement rehearsal, by Joel Dresang
Trying to transition off a treadmill, by Joel Dresang
Rust in retirement can affect finances, by Joel Dresang

(initially posted Sept. 2, 2022)

Send us a question for our next podcast.
Not a Landaas & Company client yet? Click here to learn more.
More information and insight from Money Talk
Money Talk Videos
Follow us on Twitter.
Landaas newsletter subscribers return to the newsletter via e-mail.